🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are considering parallel bans.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our children's childhood". A law may be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the options on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to approve a proposal lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a similar action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised parents to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is given. While it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a useful foundation," stated one European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any action must be "supported by strong research".

Previously, support built behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. An organization set up by the loved ones of a young person who died after viewing dangerous platform posts contends that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for young users," stated a prominent peer.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, legislation is largely unfolding at the regional government level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra time requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed measures requiring adult authorization for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain figures to copy Australia's lead, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Apart from the West, additional nations are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international agencies strike a more nuanced stance. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The body points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

While this global discussion continues, the actions of this nation and others indicate that governments globally are no longer prepared to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.